Frohlich Lab
  • Home
  • Research
    • Open Studies
    • Publications
  • Team
    • Alumni
    • Collaborators
  • Media
    • Gallery
  • tacs academy
    • tACS
    • FAQ
    • Participate
    • tACS Studies
    • Publications
    • About tACS academy
  • BOOK
  • Careers
  • Contact

Publications

A Discussion of tACS Literature

Paired associative transcranial alternating current stimulation increases the excitability of corticospinal projections in humans.

10/15/2021

0 Comments

 
McNickle, Emmet, & Richard G. Carson. 2015. Paired associative transcranial alternating current stimulation increases the excitability of corticospinal projections in humans. J Physiol. 593.7: 1649-66.
 
Summary: These authors induced spike-timing dependent plasticity (STDP)-like effects with a modified paired associative stimulation (PAS) protocol that uses tACS instead of TMS. A wide range of frequencies (80, 140, & 250 Hz) and stimulation amplitudes (1, 2, & 3, mA) were found to induce increases in corticospinal excitability measured with TMS-induced MEPs over a 30 minute period. TACS presented at 80 and 140 Hz generated the greatest increases (140 Hz evaluated as low as 1 mA). The paired effect is most robust when the peripheral afferent stimulation is long in duration (~1 sec) and this effect was observed even when applying vibrational (non-electric) stimulation to the peripheral nerve. This novel paradigm introduced new avenues for plasticity induction in the motor system that do not rely on precise timing of classic STDP protocols or more expensive equipment.  
 
Pros:
  • Wide parameter space
  • Active controls
  • Multiple experimental stages
  • High overall sample size
 
Open Questions; 
  • Can we leverage these protocols to facilitate stroke rehabilitation with lower seizure risk?
  • Can oscillatory mechanisms explain plasticity induction? 
 
Contributed by: Christopher Walker, PhD
0 Comments

Phase and frequency-dependent effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation on motor cortical excitability.

10/15/2021

0 Comments

 
Nakazono, Hisato, Katsuya Ogata, Tsuyoshi Kuroda, & Shozo Tobimatsu. 2016. Phase and frequency-dependent effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation on motor cortical excitability. PLoS ONE. 11(9): e0162521.
 
Summary: Nakazona and colleagues (2016) sought to evaluate the phase dependency of oscillatory brain stimulation effects in the human brain. In a series of experiments, the researchers measured TMS-evoked MEPs at multiple phases of 10 and 20 Hz TACS, then used the preferred phase identified to test the same effects at multiple frequencies (5, 10, 20, & 40 Hz). At 90 degrees tACS phase, 10 Hz and 20 Hz tACS demonstrated differentiated effects on MEP amplitudes whereby 10 Hz tACS attenuated MEPs and 20 Hz tACS facilitated MEPs. In a follow-up experiment, TMS delivered at the 90 degree phase of ongoing 5, 10, 20, and 40 Hz tACS demonstrated the frequency specificity of these effects by replicating the 10/20 Hz effects while showing no modulation by 5 or 40 Hz stimulation. The facilitation by 20 Hz was found to remain significant even compared to sham, but not the 10 Hz attenuation. 
 
Pros:
  • Multiple experimental stages, optimized follow-up experiments
  • Online stimulation probe of excitability
  • Phase specific stimulation
 
Open Questions: 
  • Would tACS applied at individualized mu or beta rhythms enhance the phase specific effects?
  • Do these phase-excitability relationships change during longer stimulation protocols (i.e., > 5 min)?
 
Contributed by: Christopher Walker, PhD
0 Comments

Neurophysiological aftereffects of 10 Hz and 20 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation over bilateral sensorimotor cortex

10/15/2021

0 Comments

 
Lafleur, Louis-Philippe, Gabrielle Klees-Themens, Christine Chouinard-Leclaire, Félix Larochelle-Brunet, Sara Tremblay, Jean-Francois Lepage, & Hugo Théoret. 2020. Neurophysiological aftereffects of 10 Hz and 20 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation over bilateral sensorimotor cortex. Brain Research. 1727: 146542.
 
Summary: Lafleur and colleagues (2020) applied 10 and 20 Hz tACS (1 mA) bilaterally to the motor cortex to determine how interhemispheric interactions were influenced by stimulation. By using a bilateral montage (C3-C4), the fields generated at either site were equal in magnitude but antiphase to each other. Using TMS over the left motor cortex, TACS at 10 Hz reduced the amplitude of single pulse MEPs when compared to sham and 20 Hz stimulation. Interhemispheric inhibition (IHI) of the left to right motor cortices was unchanged as were MEP amplitudes during physiological mirror movements (I.e., pinching in the contralateral hand) measured from the right hemisphere. 
 
Pro:  
  • Novel use of bilateral stimulation with interhemispheric TMS protocols.
  • Within-subject, double-blinded, sham-controlled design
 
Open Questions:  
  • Does the online effect of antiphase stimulation differ from the immediate aftereffects of stimulation? What about at longer timescales post-tACS?
 
Contributed by: Christopher Walker, PhD
0 Comments

tACS motor system effects can be caused by transcutaneous stimulation of peripheral nerves.

10/15/2021

0 Comments

 
Asamoah, B., Khatoun, A. & Mc Laughlin, M. tACS motor system effects can be caused by transcutaneous stimulation of peripheral nerves. Nature communications 10, 266, doi:10.1038/s41467-018-08183-w (2019).
 
Summary:
Asamoah et al. proposed tACS effects are caused by transcutaneous stimulation of peripheral nerves in the skin and not transcranial stimulation of cortical neurons. They conducted 4 experiments: Single neuron activity recording in the rat motor cortex. They found both transcranial and transcutaneous can entrain neuronal oscillations (~1Hz). (spike-stimPLV). Anesthetizing the scalp significantly decreases the effect of tACS on tremor in humans. When the cortex was not being directly stimulated (upper arm), tACS still causes significant tremor entrainment. Rhythmic stimulation of peripheral nerves in healthy volunteers entrains EEG beta activity.
 
Pro:
  • Anesthetize the scalp as a control for peripheral nerve input
  • Conducted experiments across species: from rodent to human
  • Combined date across scope: from single unit to EEG
 
Open question:
  • How would this finding generalize to other cortical areas?
  • Could this exclude the effect of neuron entrainment?
 
Contributed by: Wei Huang
0 Comments

Transcranial alternating current stimulation entrains single-neuron activity in the primate brain.

10/15/2021

0 Comments

 
Krause, M. R., Vieira, P. G., Csorba, B. A., Pilly, P. K. & Pack, C. C. Transcranial alternating current stimulation entrains single-neuron activity in the primate brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116, 5747-5755, doi:10.1073/pnas.1815958116 (2019).
 
Summary:
  • Krause et al. applied tACS (4mA peak to peak) in two macaque monkeys and measured the effect on single-unit neural entrainment in the hippocampus and basal ganglia (HC/BG) via depth electrodes. tACS consistently influences the timing, but not the rate, of spiking activity. Delivered 2-mA tACS (4 mA peak-to-peak) through 2 scalp electrodes and measured average electric field strengths in the hippocampus and basal ganglia of 0.28 V/m in one monkey and 0.35 V/m in another monkey.
 
Pros:
  • Built Individualized head models from high-resolution MRI and intraoperative records of implant locations
  • Frequency (1-100Hz, ±1Hz bin) and location-specific tACS effect (increase PLV in HC/BG but not in TEO)
  • Sham condition (ramp up and down) controls for nonspecific sensory effects of stimulation
  • Another control where they mirrored the tACS montage and found reduced neural entrainment. – entrainment is unlikely to be caused by peripheral or retinal stimulation
Open question:
  • 2-mA tACS in a monkey will generate fields that are on average 3 times stronger than 2-mA tACS in humans. Would a weaker electric field have similar effect? – Their follow-up article: the entrainment persisted at weaker amplitudes at 1mA and 0.5mA.
  • Is this effect possibly be induced by neuronal entrainment in cortex, and indirectly entrain deep structures (hippocampus)?
 
Contributed by: Wei Huang
0 Comments
Forward>>

    Authors

    Every week, there are new and exciting scientific papers published on studies that investigated tACS. Reading and understanding these papers unfortunately requires both access to (sometimes quite expensive) scientific journals and in-depth "insider knowledge." Our goal is to share with you brief summaries of tACS studies that give you a big-picture idea of what the publications are about. There are too many studies to feature all of them but we will continuously update this page. If you have a specific study you would like to get featured, please contact us. The contributors are personnel from the Frohlich Lab and the Carolina Center for Neurostimulation.

    Archives

    October 2021

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home
  • Research
    • Open Studies
    • Publications
  • Team
    • Alumni
    • Collaborators
  • Media
    • Gallery
  • tacs academy
    • tACS
    • FAQ
    • Participate
    • tACS Studies
    • Publications
    • About tACS academy
  • BOOK
  • Careers
  • Contact